Skip to content

Ask before a tool runs

View as Markdown

This guide makes an agent wait for a person before it calls a tool that changes something, then approves or rejects the call.

An agent turns on approval gates in its conversationPolicy. When the model asks for a gated tool, the run stops before the tool is called and waits for a reviewer. Approve, and the tool runs. Reject, and it doesn't.

  • A pack on a runtime such as kindgi dev, with Kindgi 0.2's CLI. This guide uses the pack acme-ops, with a read-only tool, acme-ops.greet.
  • A model the agent can route to, with tool-use, as Models shows.

acme-ops.post-update posts to a public status page. It changes something outside your app, so it doesn't say mutating: false. Ask your coding agent: "I want a tool that posts an update to our public status page." Kindgi's skills in your pack tell it how (How it knows Kindgi). For reference, the tool looks like this:

tools/post-update/index.ts
import { defineTool } from '@kindgi/sdk/define';
import type { ToolId } from '@kindgi/sdk/types';
import { z } from 'zod';
const defined = defineTool({
id: 'acme-ops.post-update' as ToolId,
description: 'Posts a message to the public status page.',
version: '0.1.0',
input: z.object({ message: z.string().min(1).max(500) }),
output: z.object({ posted: z.boolean(), postedAt: z.string() }),
effects: [{ kind: 'external-side-effect', resource: 'external:status-page' }],
handler: async () => ({ posted: true, postedAt: new Date().toISOString() }),
});
if (defined.kind === 'err') throw new Error(defined.error.message);
export default defined.value;

This agent posts status updates with it, and every post waits for a person. Ask your coding agent: "I want an agent that posts status updates, and asks a person before every post." For reference, the agent looks like this:

agents/status-agent/index.ts
import { defineAgent } from '@kindgi/sdk/define';
import type { AgentId, Semver } from '@kindgi/sdk/types';
const defined = defineAgent({
id: 'acme-ops.status-agent' as AgentId,
version: '0.1.0' as Semver,
name: 'Status Agent',
description: 'Posts status updates.',
instructions: 'Post the update the user gives you with acme-ops.post-update.',
capabilities: [{ needs: [{ feature: 'tool-use' as const }] }],
tools: [
{ id: 'acme-ops.post-update', version: '0.1.0' },
{ id: 'acme-ops.greet', version: '0.1.0' },
],
retrieval: [],
guardrails: [],
parameters: [],
conversationPolicy: {
hitl: {
tools: {
overrides: { 'acme-ops.post-update': 'always_ask' },
},
},
},
});
if (defined.kind === 'err') throw new Error(defined.error.message);
export default defined.value;

hitl.tools turns tool gates on for this agent. Each tool then gets a gate:

  • always_ask: every call waits for a decision.
  • never_ask: calls run without asking.
  • No override: a tool declared read-only, with mutating: false, runs without asking. Any other tool asks. So hitl: { tools: {} } asks before every tool that can change something. Here acme-ops.greet, which is read-only, never asks.

An agent without hitl.tools has no tool gates, unless your workspace has approval rules. In an Ask from a person a site signs in, every call of a tool that isn't read-only waits for a yes, whatever hitl.tools says (see What an Ask may do).

A tool call's approval names who asked: the person the turn runs for, in requestedBy (user:<id>, or service_account:<id> for an app's key). It stays the same when someone else's decision resumes the turn.

By default, that person may approve it too. hitl.separateApprover makes the approval need someone else (four eyes):

  • true applies to every gated tool.
  • Per tool, set overrides, keyed by tool id as in tools. An optional default covers the tools you don't name.
conversationPolicy: {
hitl: {
tools: { overrides: { 'acme-ops.post-update': 'always_ask' } },
separateApprover: { overrides: { 'acme-ops.post-update': true } },
},
},

Every pack language sets it the same way: Python's conversation_policy, and the map Java and Scala pass to set("conversationPolicy", …), take the same keys, separateApprover included.

When four eyes is on:

  • The person who asked isn't offered Approve. That holds on the console's approval page, in its inbox's keyboard decisions ("You asked for this, so someone else approves it."), and on the Kindgi plugin for WordPress's Approvals tab.

  • The API refuses their approve:

    {
    "error": {
    "code": "separate-approver-required",
    "message": "Approval ecaaa545-… was asked for by you: someone else must approve it",
    "details": { "approvalId": "ecaaa545-…" },
    "requestId": "…"
    }
    }
    Excerpt
  • They may still reject their own request.

  • A turn that's already waiting keeps the rule it parked with.

  • It compares people. A turn started with an app's key names the key's service account (service_account:<id>), so a person holding that key can still approve the call as themselves.

  • With ask_on_first_use, only a tool's first call is asked, and someone other than whoever asked approves that one.

  • The template's tools: the store agent sets separateApprover per tool, and defineAgent refuses an override naming a tool the agent doesn't have, so a mistyped id never leaves the real tool without four eyes.

The woocommerce template's store agent turns it on for <pack>.woo.refund-large, <pack>.woo.set-price and <pack>.woo.publish-product (acme-shop.woo.refund-large in a pack named acme-shop).

A tool can ask for a person's yes on every call no person is there to see: it declares needsApprovalWhenUnattended: true. Declare it on a tool that moves money or changes something people rely on. Then, in a run no person started:

  • An agent's call of the tool waits for a reviewer, as always_ask does. The agent's hitl can't lift it, nor can your workspace's approval rules: agents are reused, and the tool's author knows what it does. Only the schedule, webhook trigger or mail trigger that started the run can, by listing the tool (Tools allowed unattended).
  • A flow's tool step that calls it fails, as In a flow shows.

In a run a person started, the agent's own gates decide, as for any tool. Absent means false. Here acme-ops.post-update, which posts in public, declares it:

// in tools/post-update/index.ts
effects: [{ kind: 'external-side-effect', resource: 'external:status-page' }],
needsApprovalWhenUnattended: true,
Excerpt

How a run started is on the run, as startedBy:

startedBy Who started it Counts as a person
person A person: signed in (the console, the chat of the Kindgi plugin for WordPress), or with their own API key Yes
key A service account's key No
schedule, webhook, event, mail A trigger No
  • A key acts as its person. A script on your own key starts runs as you, and they count as yours. For automation, use a service account's key: its runs count as unattended.
  • A flow's agent step, and any run a run starts, started the way its run did.
  • A run from before your runtime recorded it reads as its trigger's kind when a trigger started it, and has no startedBy otherwise. Either way it counts as unattended: it never reads as a person's.
  • The woocommerce template declares it on <pack>.woo.refund, <pack>.woo.refund-large, <pack>.woo.set-price and <pack>.woo.publish-product. A staff member's refund in the store chat runs as the agent says; one an order webhook's run asks for waits for a person.

A schedule, a webhook trigger or a mail trigger can list tools its runs call without waiting for a person's yes: its tools allowed unattended (toolsAllowedUnattended, runtime 0.2.0 or later). List a tool there when the trigger is there to run it, such as a nightly status post. A mail trigger's list needs more care, since anyone who can write to the mailbox writes its runs' input (List a tool):

Terminal window
pnpm exec kindgi schedules update <schedule-id> --allow-unattended=acme-ops.post-update
  • It lifts only the wait for a person. In the trigger's runs, a listed tool's call goes as the agent's own hitl and your workspace's approval rules say, as in a run a person started: a rule that asks before the tool runs still asks. The run still acts as the trigger's owner, so the call is checked against their access. It covers both kinds of tool that ask: one that declares needsApprovalWhenUnattended, and one that uses a person's connection, reads included (Use a connection in a tool). Such a run still can't wait for anyone to connect (When the connection is missing).
  • Each entry is one tool's id, with no wildcard or pattern, at most 100 of them. Each must be a tool the trigger's agent or flow calls: the agent's tools, or a flow's tool steps and its agent steps' tools, its subflows' included. That's checked when you set it, and a tool it doesn't call is refused (400 bad-input). A schedule that starts Improve runs calls no tools, so its list stays empty.
  • Only the trigger's runs have it. A run takes the list as it is when the trigger fires, and the runs that run starts, such as a flow's agent steps, take the same list. A run that waits and resumes keeps the list it started with, so a change reaches the next fire. Any other run has none: a person's, a key's, an event trigger's. POST /v1/runs can't set one.
  • Setting it takes admin on the trigger's project, clearing it too. A caller with only write is answered 403 permission-denied.
  • With the CLI, it's --allow-unattended=<tool-id>, once for each tool, on kindgi schedules create and update, on kindgi webhooks register and update, and on kindgi mail-triggers create and update. On update it replaces the list, --allow-unattended=none clears it, and leaving it out keeps it. From your app, it's toolsAllowedUnattended on register and update of schedules, webhooks and mailTriggers (tools_allowed_unattended in Python). kindgi schedules get, kindgi webhooks get and kindgi mail-triggers get show it when it isn't empty. A schedule's or webhook trigger's page in the console shows it as Tools allowed unattended, or "None". The console doesn't change it.
  • A new owner keeps it. After a take-over, the trigger's runs call the tools it lists as the new owner, with their access, and the CLI says so, with the line that clears it. A take-over can't change the list: use update. Changing the list keeps the owner, as every change does (Shared or personal).
  • A schedule pointed at another agent or flow must name its list again, as it is or none ([] from your app), or the change is refused (400 bad-input). A new version of the same one keeps the list. Pointed at Improve runs, it must name none, since an Improve run calls no tools.
  • Each change is recorded as evidence, trigger-tools-allowed-unattended-set, with the list before and after and what the trigger runs. It's kept for good, on legal hold. A take-over's trigger-owner-set records the list it kept.

Approvals are decided by reviewers. Under kindgi dev you're one already, an admin. On any other runtime, register yourself once, as the user your API token belongs to. It covers any token of yours, a console sign-in too:

Terminal window
pnpm exec kindgi reviewers register --spec='{"role":"standard","displayName":"Ada Lovelace"}'

--spec is the reviewer: its role and, optionally, a displayName. It prints the registered reviewer, as JSON.

With authorization on, registering needs admin on the workspace (Who can do what): if you aren't a tenant admin, a tenant admin registers you, with your userId.

Decide an approval covers reviewers and their roles.

Start a turn that asks for the tool. --agent is the agent, and --input its input:

Terminal window
pnpm exec kindgi runs start --agent=acme-ops.status-agent --input='{"userMessage":"Checkout is back to normal."}'
{
"id": "0c01376f-1566-4a0d-ba6f-95f4efff4758",
…
"flowId": "agent.turn",
"flowVersion": "1.1.0",
"status": "suspended",
…
}
Excerpt

The run is suspended: the model asked for acme-ops.post-update, and the call waits. kindgi runs start returns as soon as the run waits. It doesn't block until someone decides.

List the pending approvals. --status=pending lists only the ones still pending:

Terminal window
pnpm exec kindgi approvals list --status=pending
{
"data": [
{
"id": "416c22ba-73f9-45b7-999d-c1d5938758f7",
…
"subjectKind": "tool-call:pending",
"subjectRef": {
…
"toolId": "acme-ops.post-update",
"agentId": "acme-ops.status-agent",
…
"arguments": {
"message": "Checkout is back to normal."
},
…
},
"requiredRole": "standard",
"status": "pending",
"title": "HITL review: acme-ops.post-update",
…
"provenanceRef": {
"runId": "0c01376f-1566-4a0d-ba6f-95f4efff4758"
},
…
}
],
"hasMore": false
}
Excerpt

The approval names the tool and the exact arguments the model chose, and provenanceRef.runId is the run that waits.

Decide it by the approval's id. --decision=approve lets the tool run, and --rationale is kept with the decision:

Terminal window
pnpm exec kindgi approvals complete 416c22ba-73f9-45b7-999d-c1d5938758f7 --decision=approve --rationale="Confirmed with the on-call engineer"
{
"kind": "terminal",
"approval": {
"id": "416c22ba-73f9-45b7-999d-c1d5938758f7",
…
"status": "approved",
…
},
"decision": {
…
"decision": "approve",
"rationale": "Confirmed with the on-call engineer",
"reviewerRoleAtDecision": "standard",
…
},
"waitpointResolved": true,
"resume": { "kind": "ok" }
}
Excerpt

The run continues in the same call: the tool runs and the agent finishes its turn. The tool runs at the version the turn started with, even when a newer version in the agent's range appeared while it waited.

If that version is gone by then, the turn can't go on. Under kindgi dev, that happens when the tool's file now says another version. The approval still stands, its answer says so in resume, and the run fails:

"resume": {
"kind": "failed",
"code": "tool-version-unresolvable",
"message": "Tool \"acme-ops.post-update\": this turn started with version 0.1.0, which is no longer registered; it doesn't run another version mid-turn."
}
Excerpt

Its journal says who decided which approval. kindgi runs journal <run-id> shows it:

{"sequence": 27, "kind": "wait.resumed", "nodeId": "agent-loop", "payload": {"value": {"decided": "approve", "decidedBy": "user:26fc414a-b49f-4e1f-a022-162865770178", "rationale": "Confirmed with the on-call engineer", "approvalId": "a281a631-b48b-4868-b138-213a433e8c40"}, …}, …}
Excerpt

Get the run by its id to see the tool's result:

Terminal window
pnpm exec kindgi runs get 0c01376f-1566-4a0d-ba6f-95f4efff4758
{
"id": "0c01376f-1566-4a0d-ba6f-95f4efff4758",
…
"status": "completed",
…
{
"role": "tool",
"content": {
"posted": true,
"postedAt": "2026-10-03T20:05:54.473Z"
},
…
Excerpt

With --decision=reject, the tool doesn't run. The agent gets the rejection as the tool's result, with your rationale, and finishes its turn. A real model can tell the user why nothing was posted. <approval-id> is the approval's id:

Terminal window
pnpm exec kindgi approvals complete <approval-id> --decision=reject --rationale="Not confirmed yet"

It prints the recorded decision, as approving does. The run's messages then hold the rejection as the tool's result:

{
"role": "tool",
"content": {
"status": "rejected",
"rationale": "Not confirmed yet"
},
…
Excerpt

The run completes; it doesn't fail. The turn's provenance keeps the rejected call: its tool-call, and a tool-result that is the rejection the model read.

When the agent is a step of a flow, the flow waits with it: the flow run is suspended too, and its journal shows the step waiting. <flow-run-id> is the flow run's id:

Terminal window
pnpm exec kindgi runs journal <flow-run-id>
{
"sequence": 6,
"kind": "wait.suspended",
"nodeId": "respond",
…
}
Excerpt

The approval's provenanceRef.runId is the agent step's own run, not the flow run. Once the approval is decided, the agent's turn finishes and the flow continues from that step.

A tool step can't wait for a person. In a run no person started, a step whose tool needs a person's yes fails, and the tool never runs: one that declares needsApprovalWhenUnattended, or one that uses a person's connection (Use a connection in a tool). The run's failureMessage says why:

needs-a-person: tool "acme-ops.post-update" needs a person's yes when no person started the run (needsApprovalWhenUnattended), and a flow's tool step can't wait for one. Call it from an agent step instead: there the call waits for a person to approve it.

For a tool that uses a person's connection, the reason in parentheses reads it uses a person's connection. Call such a tool from an agent step, whose call waits for a reviewer. In a schedule's, a webhook trigger's or a mail trigger's run, the message adds that the trigger could list the tool instead (Tools allowed unattended). A schedule's run's message ends:

Or a project admin can list it in the schedule's toolsAllowedUnattended, so its runs call it without one.

In a mail trigger's run, two more reasons can stop a step: a mail started the run, and it changes things (the tool isn't mutating: false), and a mail started the run, and it uses a connection of the run's own mailbox (What waits for a yes).