Corrections reference
This page lists everything about correcting runs: what a correction holds, where it goes until it's fixed, how corrector groups weigh it, what queue rules match, what the answers waiting for a correction hold, how a rule's results count, and what the console's Corrections section shows. To correct a run, follow Correct a run's output.
Corrections
Section titled “Corrections”A correction is one person's word on one run. It says at least one of these,
each right or wrong:
decisionssays whether the tools the run called were right. When it'swrong, it says what the run should have done, inshouldCallandmustNotCall, with at least one entry between them.answersays whether the run's answer was right. When it'swrong, it needsshouldSay, what the answer should have said, orwhy.itemscorrect an answer that is a ranked list, one entry for each element:{ key, pointer?, rank?, verdict }.keyis your stable id for the element, such as a matched case's id, never the element's own text. It's at most 200 characters, each key appears once, andkindgi:correctionis reserved.pointer(optional) is where the element is in the run's output, as a JSON Pointer such as/matches/2, at most 500 characters.rank(optional) is its place in the list, 0 first.verdictisrightorwrong. A wrong item needs nothing more.
And around them:
why(optional) says why, for the whole correction.- Who corrected it comes from the token, as
madeBy. An app that records corrections for its own users addsparticipantId, its own opaque id for the user. - Each person has one correction per run. Correcting the run again, as the same caller and participant, under any group or none, replaces the earlier correction. The earlier one stays in the history, and its group only says how much the correction counts.
- A correction keeps copies of the run's input and output, so it outlives the run's own retention.
- Correcting a run takes write access to its project, as cancelling it does.
- What it should have done (runtime 0.2.0 or later): a correction of an
agent's run can say it, with
decisions: "wrong". Each ofshouldCallis{ tool, args? }, and each ofmustNotCallis a tool id.argsholds only the arguments that matter; leaving it out, or{}, asks only that the tool was called. Both lists go withdecisions: "wrong"only. - How it's checked, on a replay: only the tools it names are compared.
Each tool in
shouldCallmust be called as many times as it's listed, each call matching one listed call, in any order. A listed call'sargsmatch when each field given equals the call's top-level argument of that name, compared whole, and{}matches any arguments. A tool inmustNotCallmust not be called. A call the replay refused still counts as called. - Its limits: up to 50
shouldCalland 50mustNotCall, tool ids up to 200 characters, eachargsup to 100 fields and 4,000 characters of JSON,shouldSayandwhyup to 4,000 characters each, and up to 100items.
Only a finished run can be corrected, and each item's pointer must find something:
Run "fc26b436-611b-4962-9913-2f2669ade7e1" has no output to correct yet (status suspended).Nothing at "/no/such" in run "bc6d1b53-3562-48c9-9f29-719779e3d110"'s output.A correction that breaks a rule is refused with 400 bad-input, such as:
A correction says at least one of decisions, answer and items (right or wrong).decisions: "wrong" needs at least one entry in shouldCall or mustNotCall."acme-store.refund" can't be in both shouldCall and mustNotCall.shouldCall and mustNotCall go with decisions: "wrong".answer: "wrong" needs shouldSay or why.shouldSay goes with answer: "wrong".the item key "kb-101" is in items twice.an item's key is at most 200 characters: its id, not its text.an item's pointer is at most 500 characters.verdict is gone: a correction says decisions and answer.The corrected version has no tool "acme-store.refunds".The fields item, verdict, reason and correction are gone, and each is
refused as verdict is above.
Status and sorting
Section titled “Status and sorting”Each correction moves on until it's fixed. Its status says where it is, and
sortedTo says who fixes it:
status:open,being-fixed,with-owner(the agent's owner decides),fixed,wont-fixorremoved.sortedTo:improve(the instructions, through an Improve run),developer(a change in code), orowner. It's absent while the correction is unsorted.sortedsays how it was sorted, withby({ "kind": "rule" }when it's saved,{ "kind": "fix-job" }, or{ "kind": "user", "id": … }), an optionalreason, andat.link, while it'sbeing-fixed, is the work fixing it: an Improve run, a suggested change, or a pull request's URL. An Improve run or a suggested change is named by its id alone, without their-orsc-you send ({ "kind": "improve-run", "id": … }), as their own routes take it.fixedIn, while it'sfixed, says how:howandat, withbyandversionwhen they apply. A correction that found nothing wrong is fixed asrecorded-right.reopenedInis there after a test run got afixedcorrection wrong again: theversionthat gets it wrong,howthe project came to run it (pin,went-back,unpinorlatest),at, andbyunless Latest moved. The correction isopenagain, orwith-owner, and keeps thefixedInit had. A status you set clears both; a re-sort keeps them.statusNoteis why it'swont-fix, or why it went back toopen, withtext,byandat.
When a correction is saved, it's sorted by these rules, in order:
- A user's correction (one with
participantId, not made as an expert under a restricted group) isopenand unsorted, until a person sorts it, unless the project sorts its end users' corrections (sortEndUserCorrections): then rules 2 to 4 sort it like the others. - Wrong decisions go to the owner:
with-owner, sorted toowner. A change to what the agent does may loosen a limit, and only the owner decides that. This holds when the answer is wrong too. - A wrong answer, or a wrong item, is
open, sorted toimprove. - Nothing wrong: it's
fixed, asrecorded-right.
Change a correction
Section titled “Change a correction”PATCH /v1/corrections/{id}, or corrections.change in the clients, takes
sortedTo, status, or both, with a link or a reason. In the CLI,
it's kindgi corrections set <id> with --sorted-to, --status, --link
and --reason. It needs
publish on the correction's agent or flow, or, for one that more than one
project serves, write on the correction's project.
- Re-sort with
sortedTo, fromopen,being-fixedorwith-owner. Sorted toowner, it becomeswith-owner; sorted away fromowner, it becomesopen. It's recorded as sorted by you. Abeing-fixedcorrection keeps itslink, unless the re-sort moves it to or away from the owner. being-fixed, fromopenorwith-owner, needs alink: a URL, an Improve run (ir-<its id>) or a suggested change (sc-<its id>).open, frombeing-fixedorwont-fix, takes an optionalreason. One sorted to the owner becomeswith-owner.wont-fix, from anything butremoved, needs areason. Afixedcorrection loses itsfixedIn.fixedcan't be set by hand.
Any other change is refused with 409 correction-status-change-not-allowed,
with the two statuses in details as from and to:
A correction that's fixed can't become being-fixed.A change that's missing something, or whose link is none of those, is
refused with 400 bad-input:
status: "being-fixed" needs a link: a URL, ir-<its id> or sc-<its id>.link must be a URL, an Improve run (ir-<its id>) or a suggested change (sc-<its id>).status: "wont-fix" needs a reason.link goes with status: "being-fixed".A change sets sortedTo, status, or both.Removing a correction is for its author, or an admin of its project. It
becomes removed, and it can't come back.
List and count
Section titled “List and count”GET /v1/corrections, or corrections.list in the clients, lists newest
first. Besides the run, agent, agent version, flow, group and participant, it
filters by:
status, repeated or comma-separated.not-fixedmeansopen,being-fixedandwith-owner. Removed corrections are listed only whenstatusasks forremoved.sortedTo:improve,developer,owner, ornonefor the unsorted ones, repeated or comma-separated too.from:experts(made under a restricted group),end-users(withparticipantId, and not made as experts), orall.madeBy=me: your own corrections.sinceanduntil: made at or aftersince, and beforeuntil, in ISO 8601.
GET /v1/corrections/counts?scopeKind=project&scopeId=<project-id>, with an
optional agentId, counts a project's corrections by status: open,
beingFixed, withOwner, fixed, wontFix and removed. In the
TypeScript client it's corrections.counts({ projectId, agentId }), and in
Python corrections.counts(scope_kind="project", scope_id=..., agent_id=...).
It counts in a project only, and takes read access to it.
Export
Section titled “Export”GET /v1/corrections/export?agentId=<agent-id>, or corrections.export in
the TypeScript and Python clients, streams every correction of the agent
that the list's filters match, without paging:
format:csv, the default (RFC 4180, UTF-8, a header row,text/csv), orjsonl(one correction per line, as the list sends it,application/jsonl).- Filters: the list's, above.
agentIdis required, and it takes nolimitorcursor. - Access: each correction comes only when you may read its project. A project scope you can't read is a 403, before anything is sent.
It's recorded in the audit log as two events with the same exportId:
corrections-export-started, before the first row, with who, the filters
and the format, and corrections-exported when the stream ends, with the
rows sent and an outcome of succeeded or failed (a page read broke, or
the client left). When the first can't be written, the export is a 500 and
sends nothing.
Corrector groups
Section titled “Corrector groups”-
A group weighs its corrections:
--weight=3counts each three times. Without a group, a correction counts once. -
A group applies to the tenant, a project, or an agent in a project.
-
A restriction says who may correct as the group:
--min-reviewer-role:standard,seniororadmin, a reviewer of that role or above;--principal-kind:userfor people, orservicefor service tokens;--principal-id: named users or tokens, by id.
The last two repeat. A caller must meet each one you set. In the API and the clients, it's
assertableBy. -
Whom a group names is for the admins of its scope. Anyone else who reads the group gets how many it names, as
principalCount, not their ids. -
A correction made under a restriction carries
"expert": true, inkindgi corrections listtoo. It's decided when the correction is made: corrections recorded before the restriction don't count as expert. -
Lifting a restriction, with
kindgi corrector-groups set <corrector-group-id> --unrestricted, keeps the earlier corrections marked expert. New ones aren't. -
kindgi corrector-groups setwith restriction flags replaces the whole restriction.
Test cases count expert-group corrections apart, and a run on the test cases can count only them, as Try a version on the test cases shows.
Queue rules
Section titled “Queue rules”What a rule matches, in when, each field narrowing it:
agentIdsorflowIds: runs of these agents or flows, one or the other, not both. A rule naming an agent matches the agent's own runs, not its turns as a step of a flow.versions: these versions exactly, orpinned: runs that ran the agent's pinned version rather than one the caller named. So the rule follows each release.status: how the run ended. Onlycompleted, since only a completed run can be corrected. It's also the default.includeDryRuns: dry runs are left out unless this istrue. The runs that a run on the test cases makes are never queued.
How much of it to queue:
sample: the share of matching runs,0.05for 5%. The same run and rule always give the same answer, across the rule's versions too. So raising it later keeps the runs it took before, and adds more.maxOpen: the rule adds nothing while this many of its runs wait, and starts again as they're corrected.correctorGroupId: whose correction the rule wants, a corrector group. Without it, any correction does.
A rule applies to runs that end after it's made. To try one before you make
it, queueRules.preview takes the same fields. It answers how many of the
project's last 100 runs it would have queued, with its sample but not its
maxOpen. last sets how many runs, up to 500. Give an existing rule's
ruleId to sample as it does. Without one, the count is an estimate. A run
that doesn't record how its version was chosen never matches pinned.
To catch a rule up on runs that ended before it was made,
queueRules.queueRecent queues its matches among the project's recent
runs: the last of them (up to 1,000, newest first), those completed at or
after since, or, with both, the last of those completed at or after
since. It samples as the rule samples, so it picks the runs the rule
itself would have. It doesn't apply maxOpen: a catch-up can leave more
than maxOpen of the rule's runs waiting, and the rule then adds nothing at
run end until fewer wait. The answer counts the matches three ways, which
together are all of them:
queued: queued for the rule by this call, as a new item or added to one that's already waiting for another rule.alreadyQueued: the rule had queued them already, and they're still waiting.alreadyReviewed: their run was already corrected or dismissed, so they're left as they are.
An erased run isn't a match, so it's in none of the three.
A rule only lists runs: it never runs a model or spends anything.
Change a rule
Section titled “Change a rule”queueRules.updatewrites a new version of the rule. Runs queued from then on count toward the new version.nullremovesmaxOpenorcorrectorGroupId.queueRules.versionslists every version, newest first, with who wrote each and when.queueRules.unregisterstops a rule. It queues nothing more. Its versions and the runs it queued stay.
Answers waiting for a correction
Section titled “Answers waiting for a correction”expertQueue.list gives the queue of answers waiting for a correction,
oldest first.
- Each item is a run: its agent or flow and version, how it ended, the rules that queued it, each at the version that did, the corrector groups they want, and the corrections on it so far, by group. It carries none of the run's content: open the run to correct it.
forMe: truekeeps the items you can close: those that want a group you may correct as, or any correction.- An item closes as
correctedonce each rule that queued it has the correction it wants: one of its group, or any correction for a rule without a group. expertQueue.dismiss, with an optional reason, takes a run not worth correcting out of the queue.expertQueue.reopenputs it back. Each item'scansays whether you may.- Counts:
limit: 0answers only thetotal. Withstate,addedAfterandclosedAfter, it counts, for example, how many are waiting and how many were corrected this week. - When a run's content is gone, erased or purged by
retention, its waiting item closes as
erasedand shows nothing of the run.
Reading the rules and the queue takes read access to the project. Changing a rule, queueing its recent matches, and dismissing or reopening an item, take write access, as correcting a run does.
A rule's results
Section titled “A rule's results”queueRules.results gives a group for each version of the rule and each
agent version:
- The runs it queued:
added, and of themopen,corrected,dismissedanderased. - The corrections on them, with their weighted share marked right, and the corrections by group.
- The share marked right is per correction: one person's verdict on one item of a run's output.
runsWithCorrectionscounts the runs those corrections come from: the queued runs with at least one live correction, whatever their item's state now. That's still open, closed ascorrected, or dismissed after someone corrected it.correctionscounts verdicts, so several people correcting one run make several corrections but one run here. To see how much a share rests on, count runs, not corrections.skippedByCapcounts the runs the rule matched and sampled but didn't queue becausemaxOpenwere waiting, even when another rule queued them. Soadded+skippedByCapis every run it matched and sampled. When it isn't 0, the queued runs lean toward quiet times.- Never pooled: each version of each rule is a sample of its own
when, so its results are never added to another's.
Here a rule that wants an expert's correction queued four runs. An expert,
with weight 3, and a peer corrected the first. A peer marked the second
wrong, and it's still open. A peer corrected the third, which was then
dismissed. The fourth was never corrected. So corrections is 4,
runsWithCorrections 3, and yesShare 0.83: 5 of 6 weighted verdicts.
{ "ruleId": "fd7a1785-717b-404e-bcdc-3b819806d784", "groups": [ { "ruleVersion": 1, "agentVersion": "1.0.0", "added": 4, "open": 2, "corrected": 1, "dismissed": 1, "erased": 0, "skippedByCap": 0, "corrections": 4, "runsWithCorrections": 3, "yesShare": 0.8333333333333334, "byGroup": [ { "correctorGroupId": "2da17046-eb37-4157-b175-3381a926545a", "corrections": 3, "yes": 2 }, { "correctorGroupId": "787b6f6f-30cf-4bac-bf27-ac5ef32cb6d3", "corrections": 1, "yes": 1 } ] } ]}In the console
Section titled “In the console”Corrections, in the menu's Improve group, is a project's corrections
and the runs waiting for one. Its header says what it holds: "Runs waiting
for a person to review them, every correction not fixed yet and who fixes
it, and who corrects." Its pages are To review, To fix, Who
corrects, Rules and Trends. The breadcrumbs at the top end on the
one you're on, such as Corrections › Rules ▾, and its ▾, Corrections
pages, lists the others. Their tables sort by a column's header, and
Columns chooses which columns each shows. The page, the filters and
each table's view go in the page's address, such as ?tab=rules, so a
link opens the same view. An agent's own corrections,
test set and suggested changes are pages of its own, as
Improve an agent shows.
To review
Section titled “To review”
Each row is a run in the queue:
- What ran: the agent or flow and its version, and when it finished. It links the run's Corrections page, where you correct it, as Correct a run's answer shows.
- Why it's here: the rules that queued it.
- Where it stands: what it still needs, such as "Needs an expert correction (1 so far, ungrouped)", or how a closed one ended.
Filter it by state, Waiting, Corrected, Dismissed or Erased. Or by For me or Everyone's ("2 more wait for other correctors."), by rule and by agent. Dismiss takes a run out of the queue with a reason, and Reopen puts a dismissed one back.

To fix
Section titled “To fix”To fix lists the project's corrections that aren't fixed yet, in parts by who fixes them, and leaves out a part with none:
- Nobody yet: "end users' corrections until someone hands each one on, and a flow's corrections sorted to Improve, which takes only an agent's."
- Developer: "fixes it in the pack's code or files."
- Owner: "decides the agent's or flow's rules and tools."
- Improve: "tries new wording or settings on the test set. Run it from the agent's Suggested changes page."
Each row names its agent or flow, which links that one's Corrections page, and Hand it to someone else… changes who fixes it. With none left: "Nothing to fix: every correction here is Fixed, Won't fix or Removed."
Who corrects
Section titled “Who corrects”
Who corrects lists, under Corrector groups, each corrector group that applies to the project's runs, in words:
- how much it counts, such as "Counts 3× one with no group";
- where it applies, such as "This project";
- who may give it, such as "Only people" or "Only services". Who may give an expert group is counted here, never listed;
- the rules that want it.
Below the list, the page says what makes an expert: "Corrections in an expert group are the experts' corrections: "Count only experts" counts only those."
Project admins add, change and remove a project's groups, and tenant admins a tenant's. Removing a group names the rules that want it.


Each rule is in words:
- Which runs: "Completed runs of Dev-Echo Agent", and how many it takes: "Takes every matching run", or "Takes 1 in 10".
- What it wants: "An expert correction", "Any correction" or "A bot correction".
- Its cap: "No cap", or no new items while that many are open.
- What it has open now: for example "3 open", linking To review, filtered to the rule.
A rule matches an agent's or a flow's own runs, not an agent's turns as a flow's step. Replays never match.
Project editors see New rule, and Change on each rule. The editor shows what the rule would have queued from the recent runs, and saving makes a new version of the rule. History lists what each version changed, who changed it and when. Remove stops a rule, and the runs it queued stay in the queue.


Trends
Section titled “Trends”
Trends shows, per rule and by its latest version, the share marked right among people's corrections of each agent version, over all time or the last 90 or 30 days. These are a rule's results:
- A version shows from 10 corrections. With fewer, it says so: "1.0.0: too few corrections to say (2 so far)".
- Each line names its corrections and its range: "1.1.0: about 95% marked right, from 12 corrections (12 runs corrected so far); range 64–100%".
- A comparison only when the ranges are apart: "1.1.0 is marked right more often than 1.0.0."
- The weights, in words: "Weighted by corrector group: An expert's correction counts 3× one with no group; a bot's correction counts the same as one with no group."
- What the numbers leave out: an earlier version of the rule is "shown apart, never added in". Runs the cap kept out are counted: "1 matched run wasn't queued because the rule already had its most open runs waiting, so the queued ones lean toward quieter times."
Every count opens the counts behind a rule's trend.
